4.7 Article

Crystal structure, thermal decomposition mechanism and explosive properties of [Na(H2TNPG)(H2O)2]n

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 129, 期 1-3, 页码 31-36

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.08.014

关键词

complex of sodium trinitrophloroglucinate; molecular structure; thermal decomposition mechanism; explosive properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The new coordination polymer of sodium trinitrophloroglucinate, [Na(H(2)TNPG)(H2O)(2)](n), was synthesized by reacting trinitrophloroglucinol (H(3)TNPG) with NaHCO3 in aqueous solution and [Na(H(2)TNPG)(H2O)(2)](n) was recrystallized to be yellow single crystal. The title compound was characterized by using elemental analysis and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum. Its crystal structure was determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The crystalline belongs to monoclinic system and C2/c space group. Each Ne ion is six-coordinated to one H(2)TNPG(-) anion and four water molecules in which the oxygen atoms in the water molecules act as bridging atoms. Coordination bonds, electrostatic interaction and intermolecular hydrogen bonds assemble the ions into network structures. The thermal decomposition mechanism of the complex was studied by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry/derivative thermogravimetry (TG/DTG) and FT-IR techniques. Under nitrogen atmosphere with a heating rate of 10 degrees C/min the thermal decomposition of the complex contained one endothermic and five exothermic processes. Two intense exothermic decomposition processes were observed in the range of 173-228 degrees C suggesting its energetic nature and the solid decomposition residue at 500 degrees C was sodium isonitrile. Explosive properties revealed that the compound is sensitive to mechanical stimuli. All properties data observed show that the title compound has explosive properties and can act as components of ecologically clean initiating compositions. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据