4.7 Article

Ab initio nonadiabatic quantum dynamics of cyclohexadiene/hexatriene ultrafast photoisomerization

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 124, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2171688

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reaction mechanisms of the ultrafast photoisomerization between cyclohexadiene and hexatriene have been elucidated by the quantum dynamics on the ab initio potential energy surfaces calculated by multireference configuration interaction method. In addition to the quantum wave-packet dynamics along the two-dimensional reaction coordinates, the semiclassical analyses have also been carried out to correctly estimate the nonadiabatic transition probabilities around conical intersections in the full-dimensional space. The reaction time durations of radiationless decays in the wave-packet dynamics are found to be generally consistent with the femtosecond time-resolution experimental observations. The nonadiabatic transition probabilities among the ground (S-0), first (S-1), and second (S-2) excited states have been estimated by using the semiclassical Zhu-Nakamura formula considering the full-dimensional wave-packet density distributions in the vicinity of conical intersections under the harmonic normal mode approximation. The cyclohexadiene (CHD) ring-opening process proceeds descending on the S-1(1 B-1) potential after the photoexcitation. The major part of the wave-packet decays from S-1(1 B-1) to S-1(2 (1)A) by the first seam line crossing along the C-2-symmetry-breaking directions. The experimentally observed ultrafast S-1-S-0 decay can be explained by the dynamics through the S-1-S-0 conical intersection along the direction toward the five-membered ring. The CHD: hexatriene (HT) branching ratio is estimated to be approximately 5:5, which is in accordance with the experiment in solution. This branching ratio is found to be mainly governed by the location of the five-membered ring S-1-S-0 conical intersection along the ground state potential ridge between CHD and HT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据