4.7 Article

Study of two markers of apoptosis and meiotic segregation in ejaculated sperm of chromosomal translocation carrier patients

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 685-693

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei401

关键词

apoptosis; chromosomal translocation; DNA fragmentation; meiotic segregation; phosphatidylserine externalization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: To try to explain the infertility of chromosomal translocation carrier patients, we compared the expression of two markers of apoptosis in the sperm of patients and of fertile donors, and we studied the meiotic segregation in the ejaculated sperm of these translocation carriers. METHODS: Twenty semen samples of translocation carriers, [reciprocal (n = 14) and Robertsonian translocations (n = 6)], were compared with the semen samples of donors (n = 20). Different tests were applied: annexin V binding assay; terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labelling (TUNEL); and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: The annexin V binding assay in sperm of patients with chromosomal translocation (n = 17) showed a significantly increased proportion of sperm with externalized phosphatidylserine (PS) than in the control group (n = 20, P <= 0.05). The rates of DNA fragmentation investigated by TUNEL reaction were higher in samples of translocation carriers (n = 14) than in donors (n = 20, P < 0.0001). The measures by FISH technique showed that the proportions of balanced or normal gametes were predominant in the reciprocal translocation group (alternate: n = 7; from 33.0 to 58.8%; adjacent I: n = 7; from 4.6 to 43.8%) and in the Robertsonian translocation group (normal: n = 5; from 76.0 to 88.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a predominant proportion of balanced gametes in sperm of chromosomal translocation carrier patients. Moreover, PS externalization and DNA fragmentation rates are significantly higher in ejaculated sperm of these patients than in donor sperm. These tests could be used to predict the outcome of ICSI for these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据