4.7 Article

Apolipoproteins C-III and A-V as predictors of very-low-density lipoprotein triglyceride and apolipoprotein B-100 kinetics

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000203519.25116.54

关键词

apoA-V; apoC-III; cardiovascular disease; lipoprotein metabolism

资金

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [P41 EB-001975] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective - We investigated the associations between plasma very-low-density lipoprotein ( VLDL)-apolipoprotein ( apo) C-III and apoA-V concentrations and the kinetics of VLDL-apoB-100 and VLDL triglycerides in 15 men. We also explored the relationship between these parameters of VLDL metabolism and VLDL-apoC-III kinetics. Methods and Results - ApoC-III, apoB, and triglyceride kinetics in VLDL were determined using stable isotopes and multicompartmental modeling to estimate production rate ( PR) and fractional catabolic rate ( FCR). Plasma VLDL apoC-III concentration was significantly and inversely associated with the FCRs of VLDL triglycerides ( r = -0.610) and VLDL-apoB ( r = -0.791), and positively correlated with the PR of VLDL-apoC-III ( r = 0.842). However, apoA-V concentration was not significantly associated with any of the kinetic variables. There was a significant association ( P < 0.01) between the PRs of VLDL triglycerides and VLDL-apoB ( r = 0.641), and between the FCRs of VLDL triglycerides and VLDL - apoB ( r = 0.737). In multiple regression analysis, plasma VLDL-apoC-III concentration was a significant predictor of VLDL triglyceride FCR ( beta-coefficient = -0.575) and VLDL-apoB FCR ( eta-coefficient = -0.839). Conclusions - Our findings suggest that increased VLDL-apoC-III concentrations resulting from an overproduction of VLDL-apoC-III are strongly associated with the delayed catabolism of triglycerides and apoB in VLDL. We also demonstrated that the kinetics of VLDL triglycerides and apoB are closely coupled. Our data do not support a role for plasma apoA-V in regulating VLDL kinetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据