4.6 Article

Sodium intake and mortality in the NHANES II follow-up study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 119, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.042

关键词

sodium; cardiovascular disease; mortality; dietary guidelines; NHANES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: US Dietary Guidelines recommend a daily sodium intake < 2300 mg, but evidence linking sodium intake to mortality outcomes is scant and inconsistent. To assess the association of sodium intake with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality and the potential impact of dietary sodium intake < 2300 mg, we examined data from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II). METHODS: Observational cohort study linking sodium, estimated by single 24-hour dietary recall and adjusted for calorie intake, in a community sample (n = 7154) representing 78.9 million non-institutionalized US adults (ages 30-74). Hazard ratios (HR) for CVD and all-cause mortality were calculated from multivariable adjusted Cox models accounting for the sampling design. RESULTS: Over mean 13.7 ( range: 0.5-16.8) years follow-up, there were 1343 deaths (541 CVD). Sodium (adjusted for calories) and sodium/calorie ratio as continuous variables had independent inverse associations with CVD mortality (P =.03 and P =.008, respectively). Adjusted HR of CVD mortality for sodium < 2300 mg was 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.81, P =.033), and 1.28 (95% CI: 1.10-1.50, P =.003) for all-cause mortality. Alternate sodium thresholds from 1900-2700 mg gave similar results. Results were consistent in the majority of subgroups examined, but no such associations were observed for those < 55 years old, non-whites, or the obese. CONCLUSION: The inverse association of sodium to CVD mortality seen here raises questions regarding the likelihood of a survival advantage accompanying a lower sodium diet. These findings highlight the need for further study of the relation of dietary sodium to mortality outcomes. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据