4.4 Article

Contribution of microdissection for the detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 361-368

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.06.022

关键词

colorectal cancer; microsatellite instability; genetic heterogeneity; microdissection; loss of heterozygosity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The determination of microsatellite instability (MSI) is an important step in the identification of familial colorectal cancer such as hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. It could also be of interest in the therapeutic management of sporadic cancer. International criteria for the determination of MSI have been published, recommending the use of microdissection. The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of contaminant normal DNA in tumor samples for MSI assessment in colorectal cancer using a microdissection technique. We performed a comparative analysis of the microsatellite status between total DNA (DNA extracted from whole turner samples) and microdissected DNA in 3 different regions from 23 cases of colorectal cancer. Six microsatellites were amplified using fluorescent polymerase chain reaction. We analyzed 9 cases with MSI and 14 cases without instability.. with similar results between total DNA and microdissected DNA. Moreover, within a same tumor, the MSI phenotype was observed regardless of the region analyzed. Thus, this work shows the reproducibility of the MSI phenotype throughout a tumor. However, we observed a regional heterogeneity of the MSI profile, consisting of variations in the number and the size of unstable alleles within different regions. This result reflects the genetic heterogeneity of colorectal cancer with MSI. In the 14 cases without instability, we observed an increase of more than 60% in the loss of heterozygosity detection rate after microdissection. Thus, this work confirms the contribution of microdissection for loss of heterozygosity assessment. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据