4.5 Article

Telomere length as a quantitative trait: Genome-wide survey and genetic mapping of telomere length-control genes in yeast

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 304-315

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020035

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 78746, P20 CA103728, CA 103728] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL04211] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R37 MH59520, R37 MH059520] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Telomere length-variation in deletion strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used to identify genes and pathways that regulate telomere length. We found 72 genes that when deleted confer short telomeres, and 80 genes that confer long telomeres relative to those of wild-type yeast. Among identified genes, 88 have not been previously implicated in telomere length control. Genes that regulate telomere length span a variety of functions that can be broadly separated into telomerase-dependent and telomerase-independent pathways. We also found 39 genes that have an important role in telomere maintenance or cell proliferation in the absence of telomerase, including genes that participate in deoxyribonucleotide biosynthesis, sister chromatid cohesion, and vacuolar protein sorting. Given the large number of loci identified, we investigated telomere lengths in 13 wild yeast strains and found substantial natural variation in telomere length among the isolates. Furthermore, we crossed a wild isolate to a laboratory strain and analyzed telomere length in 122 progeny. Genome-wide linkage analysis among these segregants revealed two loci that account for 30% 35% of telomere length-variation between the strains. These findings support a general model of telomere length-variation in outbred populations that results from polymorphisms at a large number of loci. Furthermore, our results laid the foundation for studying genetic determinants of telomere length-variation and their roles in human disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据