4.7 Article

Managing sulphur metabolism in plants

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 382-395

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01470.x

关键词

cysteine synthesis; metabolic regulation; nutrition; sulphate transporters

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004145] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004145] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resolution and analysis of genes encoding components of the pathways of primary sulphur assimilation have provided the potential to elucidate how sulphur is managed by plants. Individual roles for members of gene families and regulatory mechanisms operating at gene, cellular and whole plant levels have been recognized. Sulphur is taken up and transported around the plant principally as sulphate, catalysed for the most part by a single gene family of highly regulated transporters. Additional regulation occurs in the pathway of reduction of sulphate to sulphide and its incorporation into cysteine, which occurs principally within the plastid. Cellular and whole-plant regulation of uptake, and the assimilatory pathway attempt to balance supply with demand for growth and include mechanisms for re-mobilization and redistribution of sulphur. Furthermore, optimization of sulphur assimilation requires coordination with carbon and nitrogen pathways, and multiple processes have been proposed to contribute to this balance. Present studies on cis and trans elements are focusing on transcriptional regulation, but this regulation still needs to be linked to apparent metabolite sensing. Whilst the components of the assimilatory pathways have been resolved after many years of controversy, uncertainties remain concerning roles of individual genes in gene families, their sub-cellular localization and their significance in balancing sulphur flux to sulphur demand of the plant for growth under variable environmental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据