4.6 Article

Reduced Th1 response in the lungs of HLA-DRB1*0301 patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 451-459

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00067105

关键词

bronchoalveolar lavage; cytokine; interferon-gamma; tumour necrosis factor-alpha; sarcoidosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate why human leukocyte-associated antigen-DRB1*0301 (HLA-DRB1*0301) positive Scandinavian patients have a better prognosis than HLA-DRB1*0301 negative patients, the present authors examined patterns of cytokine expression in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells and BAL fluid (BALF) from patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis and controls. Using real-time PCR, the mRNA expression of selected cytokines in BAL cells from newly diagnosed, untreated nonsmoking patients (n=25) and controls (n=11) was quantified. Cytokine protein levels in BALF from patients (n=34) and controls (n=11) were assessed using cytometric bead array. The patients were evaluated and stratified into two subgroups: HLA-DRB1*0301 positive (all with an acute onset) and HLA-DRB1*0301 negative (all with an insidious onset). When comparing patients and controls, BAL cells of the patients expressed significantly higher levels of interferon (IFN)-gamma and interleukin (IL)-10 mRNA. There were significantly decreased IFN-gamma and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha mRNA levels, and a tendency toward higher levels of transforming growth factor-beta 1 mRNA in HLA-DRB1*0301 positive compared with HLA-DRB1*0301 negative patients. Protein levels of IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12p70 and TNF-alpha in BALF were significantly higher in patients. HLA-DRB1*0301 positive patients exhibited tendencies to lower levels of most cytokines in BALF. In conclusion, the present data show a reduced expression of T-helper cell type-1 cytokines in human leukocyte-associated antigen-DRB1*0301 positive patients, which may relate to their good prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据