4.6 Article

Age-associated impairment in vasorelaxation to fluid shear stress in the female vasculature is improved by TNF-α antagonism

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00990.2005

关键词

tumor necrosis factor-alpha; estrogen deficiency; flow dilation; nitric oxide; endothelium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging is associated with alterations in vascular homeostasis, including a reduction in flow-mediated vasodilation, which in women is related to the onset of menopause. We previously found that in female animals, aging is associated with an increase in TNF-alpha. Thus we investigated the role of in vivo TNF-alpha inhibition on vascular responses to shear stress in aging female rats. Mesenteric arteries (similar to 150 mu m) were isolated from young (3 mo) and ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley female rats approaching reproductive senescence (12 mo) treated with either placebo or a TNF-alpha inhibitor (etanercept; 0.3 mg/kg) and were mounted on a pressure myograph system. Vessels were equilibrated at an intraluminal pressure of 60 mmHg and then preconstricted with phenylephrine at similar to 70% of their initial diameter. Perfusate flow was increased in steps from 0 to 150 mu l/min. Compared with young vessels, aged vessels have a decrease in flow-mediated dilation [maximal dilation (means +/- SE): 52 +/- 4 vs. 24 +/- 15%; P < 0.05], which was improved by TNF-alpha inhibition. Moreover, in aged vessels maximal dilation to flow was achieved at higher levels of shear stress compared with young vessels. In all groups, flow-mediated dilation was abolished by either endothelial removal or nitric oxide synthase inhibition with N-G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. However, the modulation by N-G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester was reduced in vessels from aged animals compared with young animals but was improved in the etanercept- treated aged animals. In vivo chronic TNF-alpha inhibition improves flow-mediated arterial dilation in resistance arteries of aged female animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据