4.6 Article

Expression of procollagen C-proteinase enhancer-1 in the remodeling rat heart is stimulated by aldosterone

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2005.10.007

关键词

myocardial infarction; collagen; procollagen C-proteinase enhancer; fibrosis; rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excessive collagen deposition is a common complication of myocardial infarction that causes progressive heart disease. Several pro-fibrotic cytokines and hormones, including aldosterone, control this process. Procollagen processing by procollagen C-proteinase(s) is critical for collagen deposition and is potentiated by procollagen C-proteinase enhancer proteins (PCPEs). We have shown previously that, in addition to stimulation of collagen I expression, aldosterone increases PCPE-1 expression in cultured heart fibroblasts. The present study was designed to examine whether aldosterone acts similarly in vivo. Rats underwent coronary artery ligation to induce myocardial infarction. They were then left either untreated (control) or treated with spironolactone (an aldosterone receptor antagonist) for 5 weeks when they were sacrificed and their hearts removed for analysis. In situ hybridization co-localized PCPE-1 and collagen I mRNAs to fibroblasts surrounding the scar region and adjacent blood vessels. The levels of both transcripts in the remodeling myocardium of untreated rats increased twofold as compared to sham-operated controls, an increase greatly reduced by spironolactone. Correspondingly, a 2-5 fold increase in PCPE-1 and collagen I was observed in the hearts of untreated rats as compared to both the spironolactone-treated and sham-operated controls. The results establish aldosterone as a physiological stimulator of PCPE-1 expression in the remodeling myocardium after infarction. Since PCPE-1 itself is a positive regulator of collagen deposition, this finding suggests PCPE-1 as a new potential target for intervention with cardiac fibrosis. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据