4.5 Article

The potential of training to increase acceptance and use of computerized decision support systems for medical diagnosis

期刊

HUMAN FACTORS
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 95-108

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1518/001872006776412306

关键词

-

资金

  1. PHS HHS [290-01-0009] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The goals of this study were to understand the reasons underlying the limited use of medical decision-support tools and to explore the potential of a computer-based tutorial to mitigate barriers to use. Background: Medical decision-support tools such the Acute Cardiac Ischemia Time-Insensitive Predictive Instrument (ACI-TIPI) have demonstrated statistical validity and clinical impact for patient safety but have seen limited adoption and use. Methods: The study developed a brief Web-based demystifying ACI-TIPI tutorial employing case-based training and evaluated the effectiveness of that tutorial in changing self-reported attitudes and behaviors. Results: Clinicians using the tutorial reported greater understanding of how to use the ACI-TIPI score appropriately and increased confidence in the score. Case studies in the tutorial that provided examples of how to use the score for actual cases were rated as especially helpful. Conclusion: This study suggests that a primary barrier to the use of statistical decision support tools for patient diagnosis is lack of training or experience in combining it population-based numerical risk score with other diagnostic information about the individual patient's case that is not considered in that score. The results of this study indicate that there is a potential for a relatively brief tutorial to increase acceptance and use of decision support tools for medical diagnosis. Application: These findings have the potential for the identification of methods to help clinicians learn how to use statistical and probabilistic information to better assess risk and to promote integration of decision support tools into medical decision making for improvement of patient safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据