4.3 Article

Early life predictors of childhood intelligence: findings from the Mater-University study of pregnancy and its outcomes

期刊

PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 148-162

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00704.x

关键词

childhood intelligence; IQ determinants; Mater-University study

资金

  1. MRC [MC_U130059821] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U130059821] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U130059821] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lawlor DA, Najman JM, Batty GD, O'Callaghan MJ, Williams GM, Bor W Early life predictors of childhood intelligence: findings from the Mater-University study of pregnancy and its outcomes. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2006; 20: 148-162. Growing evidence linking childhood intelligence with adult health outcomes suggests a need to identify predictors of this psychological characteristic. In this study, we have examined the early life determinants of childhood intelligence in a population-based birth cohort of individuals born in Brisbane, Australia between 1981 and 1984. In univariable analyses, family income in the year of birth, maternal and paternal education, maternal age at birth, maternal ethnicity, maternal smoking during pregnancy, duration of labour, birthweight, breast feeding and childhood height, and body mass index were all associated with intelligence at age 14. In multivariable analyses, the strongest and most robust predictors of intelligence were fan-Lily income, parental education and breast feeding, with these three variables explaining 7.5% of the variation in intelligence at age 14. Addition of other variables added little further explanatory power. Our results demonstrate the importance of indicators of socio-economic position as predictors of intelligence, and illustrate the need to consider the role of such factors in generating the association of childhood intelligence with adult disease risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据