4.7 Article

Late sporadic miscarriage is associated with abnormalities in spiral artery transformation and trophoblast invasion

期刊

JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 208, 期 4, 页码 535-542

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/path.1927

关键词

trophoblast; placenta; placental bed; miscarriage; spiral artery; transformation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trophoblast invasion of uterine decidua and myometrium, and spiral artery transformation, are essential for the development of normal pregnancy; this process is impaired in pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and pre-term labour. The hypothesis that late miscarriage is associated with reduced trophoblast invasion and spiral artery transformation was tested in a large series of placental bed biopsies containing decidua and myometrium from late, karyotyped, embryonic miscarriage (>= 13 weeks' gestation; n = 26; n = 96 spiral arteries) and gestationally matched ultrasound-dated normal pregnancies (n = 74; n = 236 spiral arteries). Cryostat sections were immunostained using an avidin-biotin peroxidase technique for cytokeratin, desmin, and von Willebrand factor to detect trophoblast, myometrium, and vascular smooth muscle and endothelium, respectively. Trophoblast invasion and individual features of spiral artery transformation were assessed and analysed using a logistic regression model. Compared with normal pregnancy, myometrial spiral arteries in late miscarriage showed reduced endovascular (4% vs. 31%, p = 0.001) and intramural trophoblast (76% vs. 88%, p = 0.05), and less extensive fibrinoid change (4% vs. 18%, p = 0.01). In contrast, endovascular trophoblast in decidual spiral arteries was increased (40% vs. 66%, p = 0.04). These findings suggest that, in common with pre-eclampsia, late sporadic miscarriage may be associated with reduced trophoblast invasion and inadequate transformation of myometrial spiral arteries. Copyright (c) 2006 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据