4.7 Review

The immunogenicity of anti-TNF therapy in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis

期刊

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 72, 期 12, 页码 1947-1955

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202220

关键词

Autoimmune Diseases; Anti-TNF; Methotrexate

资金

  1. Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian
  2. Fundacao Champalimaud
  3. Ministerio da Saude
  4. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Immunogenicity of aTNFs is one of the mechanisms behind treatment failure. Objective To assess the effect of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) on drug response to infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept, and the effect of immunosuppression on ADA detection, in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Spondyloarthritis, Psoriasis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Data sources PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, article reference lists (through August 19 2012). Study selection Out of 2082 studies, 17 were used in the meta-analysis (1RCT; 16 observational studies). Data extraction Two reviewers extracted data. Risk ratios (RR), 95% CI, using random-effect models, sensitivity analysis, meta-regressions and Egger's test were calculated. Data synthesis Of 865 patients, ADA against infliximab or adalimumab reduced drug response rate by 68% (RR=0.68, 95% CI=0.12 to 0.36), an effect attenuated by concomitant methotrexate (MTX): <74% MTX+: RR=0.23, 95% CI=0.15 to 0.36; 74% MTX+: RR=0.32, 95% CI=0.22 to 0.48. Anti-etanercept antibodies were not detected. Of 936 patients, concomitant MTX or azathioprine/mercaptopurine reduced ADA frequency by 47% (RR=0.53, 95% CI=0.42 to 0.67), particularly when ADA were assessed by RIA (RR=0.36, 95% CI=0.23 to 0.55) compared with ELISA (RR=0.63, 95% CI=0.53 to 0.74). Conclusions ADA reduces drug response, an effect that can be attenuated by concomitant immunosuppression, which reduces ADA frequency. Drug immunogenicity should be considered for the management of patients receiving biological therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据