4.1 Article

Purification and functional characterization of aquaporin-8

期刊

BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 98, 期 3, 页码 153-161

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1042/BC20050026

关键词

ammonium transport; formamide; methylammonium; proteoliposome; water permeability

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY11239] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL33991, HL48268] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background information. Aquaporins (AQPs) are a family of channels permeable to water and some small solutes. In mammals, 13 members (AQPO-AQP12) have been found. AQP8 is widely distributed in many tissues and organs. Previous studies in frog oocytes suggested that AQP8 was permeable to water, urea and ammonium, but no direct characterization had yet been reported. Results. We expressed recombinant rAQP8, hAQP8 and mAQP8 (rat, human and mouse AQP8 respectively) in yeast, purified the proteins to homogeneity and reconstituted them into proteoliposomes. Although showing high sequence similarity, AQP8 proteins from the three species had to be purified with different detergents prior to reconstitution. In stopped-flow studies, all three AQP8 proteoliposomes showed water permeability, which was inhibited by mercuric chloride and rescued by 2-mercaptoethanol. rAQP8 and hAQP8 proteoliposomes did not transport glycerol or urea but were permeable to formamide, which was also inhibited by mercuric chloride. In the oocyte transport assay, hAQP8-injected oocytes showed significantly higher [C-14]methylammonium uptake than water-injected oocytes. Conclusions. In the present study, we successfully purified rAQP8, hAQP8 and mAQP8 proteins and characterized their biochemical and biophysical properties. All three AQP8 proteins transport water. rAQP8 and hAQP8 are not permeable to urea or glycerol. Moreover, hAQP8 is permeable to ammonium analogues (formamide and methylammonium). Our results suggest that AQP8 may transport ammonium in vivo and physiologically contribute to the acid-base equilibrium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据