4.6 Article

cAMP cascade (PKA, epac, adenylyl cyclase, Gi, and phosphodiesterases) regulates myelin phagocytosis mediated by complement receptor-3 and scavenger receptor-AI/II in microglia and macrophages

期刊

GLIA
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 441-448

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/glia.20303

关键词

Wallerian degeneration; axonal injury; myelin phagocytosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The removal by phagocytosis of degenerated myelin is Central for repair in Wallerian degeneration that follows traumatic injury to axons and in autoimmune demyelinating diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis). We tested for roles played by the cAMP cascade in the regulation of myelin phagocytosis mediated by complement receptor-3 (CR3/MAC-1) and scavenger receptor-AI/II (SRAI/II) separately and combined in mouse microglia and macrophages. Components of the cAMP cascade tested are cAMP, adenylyl cyclase (AC), Gi, protein kinase A (PKA), exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac), and phosphodiesterases (PDE). PKA inhibitors H-89 and PKI14-22 amide inhibited phagocytosis at normal operating cAMP levels (i.e., those occurring in the absence of reagents that alter cAMP levels), suggesting activation of phagocytosis through PKA at normal cAMP levels. Phagocytosis was inhibited by reagents that elevate endogenous cAMP levels to above normal: Gi-inhibitor Pertussis toxin (PTX), AC activator Forskolin, and PDE inhibitors IBMX and Rolipram. Phagocytosis was inhibited also by cAMP analogues whose addition mimics abnormal elevations in endogenous cAMP levels: nonselective 8-bromo-cAMP, PKA-specific 6-Benz-cAMP, and Epac-specific 8-CPT-2'-O-Me-cAMP, suggesting that abnormal high cAMP levels inhibit phagocytosis through PKA and Epac. Altogether, observations suggest a dual role for cAMP and PKA in phagocytosis: activation at normal cAMP levels and inhibition at higher. Furthermore, a balance between Gi-controlled cAMP production by AC and cAMP degradation by PDE maintains normal operating cAMP levels that enable efficient phagocytosis. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据