4.1 Article

Ultrastructure of the circumoral nerve ring and the radial nerve cords in holothurians (Echinodermata)

期刊

ZOOMORPHOLOGY
卷 125, 期 1, 页码 27-38

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00435-005-0010-9

关键词

nervous system; Holothuroidea; ectoneural-hyponeural connection; synapses; glial cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The circumoral nerve ring and the radial nerve cords (RNCs) of Eupentacta fraudatrix and Pseudocnus lubricus (Holothuroidea) were examined as an example of holothurian nervous tissue. The RNC is composed of outer ectoneural and inner hyponeural layers, which are interconnected with one another via short neural bridges. The circumoral nerve ring is purely ectoneural. Both ectoneural and hyponeural components are epithelial tubes with a thick neuroepithelium at one side. A thin ciliated non-neuronal epithelium complements the neuroepithelium to form a tube, thereby enclosing the epineural and hyponeural canals. The whole of the ectoneural and hyponeural subsystems is separated from the surrounding tissue by a continuous basal lamina. The nerve ring and the ectoneural and hyponeural parts of the radial nerves are all neuroepithelia composed of supporting cells and neurons. Supporting cells are interpreted as being glial cells. Based on ultrastructural characters, three types of neurons can be distinguished: (1) putative primary sensory neurons, whose cilium protrudes into the epineural or hyponeural canal; (2) non-ciliated neurons with swollen rough endoplasmic reticulum cisternae; (3) monociliated neurons that are embedded in the trunk of nerve fibers. Different types of synapses occur in the neuropile area. They meet all morphological criteria of classical chemical synapses. Vacuolated cells occur in the neuroepithelium of E. fraudatrix, but are absent in P. lubricus; their function is unknown. The cells of the non-neuronal epithelia that overlie the ectoneural and hyponeural canals are hypothesized to belong to the same cell type as the supporting cells of the neuroepithelium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据