4.5 Article

Differential changes in muscle oxygenation between voluntary and stimulated isometric fatigue of human dorsiflexors

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 100, 期 3, 页码 890-895

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00921.2005

关键词

near-infrared spectroscopy; electrical stimulation; oxygen saturation; contractile slowing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to compare fatigue and recovery of maximal voluntary torque [ maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)] and muscle oxygenation after voluntary (Vol) and electrically stimulated (ES) protocols of equal torque production. On 1 day, 10 male subjects [25 yr (SD 4)] completed a Vol fatigue protocol and, on a separate day, an ES fatigue protocol of the right dorsiflexors. Each task involved 2 min of intermittent (2-s on, 1-s off) isometric contractions at 50% of MVC. For the ES protocol, stimulation was delivered percutaneously to the common peroneal nerve at a frequency of 25 Hz. Compared with the Vol protocol, the ES protocol caused a greater impairment in MVC (75 vs. 83% prefatigue value; Pre) and greater increase in 50-Hz half relaxation time (165 vs. 117% Pre) postexercise. After acute (1 min) recovery, MVC impairment was similar for both protocols, whereas 50-Hz half relaxation time was still greater in the ES than Vol protocol. Total hemoglobin decreased to a similar extent in both protocols during exercise, but it was elevated above the resting value to a significantly greater extent for the ES protocol in recovery (18 vs. 11 mu M). Oxygen saturation was significantly lower in the ES than Vol protocol during exercise (46 vs. 57% Pre), but it was significantly greater during recovery ( 120 vs. 105% Pre). These findings suggest that despite, equal torque production, ES contractions impose a greater metabolic demand on the muscle that leads to a transient greater impairment in MVC. The enforced synchronization and fixed frequency of excitation inherent to ES are the most likely causes for the exacerbated changes in the ES compared with the Vol protocol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据