3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Maternal depressive symptoms at 2 to 4 months post partum and early parenting practices

期刊

ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
卷 160, 期 3, 页码 279-284

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.160.3.279

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether maternal depressive symptoms, reported when infants are 2 to 4 months old, are associated with mothers' early parenting practices. Design: Secondary data analyses collected from the National Evaluation of Healthy Steps for Young Children. Data sources included newborn enrollment questionnaires and parent interviews when infants were 2 to 4 months old. Maternal depressive symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Setting: Twenty-four pediatric practices across the United States. Participants: A total of 5565 families enrolled in Healthy Steps; 4874 mothers (88%) completed 2- to 4-month interviews and provided Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale data; 17.8% of mothers reported having depressive symptoms. Main Outcome Measures: Ten parenting practices assessed in 3 domains: safety (sleep position and lowering water temperature), feeding (cereal, water, or juice; continuing breastfeeding), and practices to promote child development (showing books, playing with infant, talking to infant, and following 2 or more routines). Results: Mothers with and without depressive symptoms reported similar uses of safety and feeding practices. Mothers with depressive symptoms had reduced odds of continuing breastfeeding (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.61-0.88), showing books (AOR, 0.81; 95% Cl, 0.68-0.97), playing with the infant (AOR, 0.70; 95% Cl, 0.54-0.90), talking to the infant (AOR, 0.74; 95% Cl, 0.63-0.86), and following routines (AOR, 0.61; 95% Cl, 0.52-0.72). Conclusion: Maternal depressive symptoms are common in early infancy and contribute to unfavorable parenting practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据