4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Oocyte maturity and preimplantation development in relation to follicle diameter in gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist treatments

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 85, 期 3, 页码 578-583

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.033

关键词

follicles; oocyte maturation; oocyte development; GnRH analogues

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To analyze the distribution of oocytes nuclear maturational stages and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome in relation to follicular size, after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or agonist protocols. Design: Prospective comparative study. Setting: Fertility unit in an academic hospital. Patient(s): Normo-ovulatory patients with unexplained, male and/or tubal factor infertility undergoing ICSI treatment. Intervention(s): Oocytes were retrieved from small (7-12 mm) and large follicles (> 12 mm). Main Outcome Measure(s): Oocyte nuclear maturation stage, fertilization and pre-implantation embryonic development of the mature ova evaluated. Result(s): Distribution of oocyte maturation stages from small follicles did not differ between the two COH protocols. From large follicles, a statistically significantly higher percentage of immature oocytes was retrieved after antagonist compared with agonist treatment (16 vs 11%, respectively). No statistically significant differences existed regarding ICSI outcome of mature ova within the same follicle diameter range between COH protocols. Inseminated ova from small follicles presented a significantly higher number of embryos with delayed development on day 3 after ICSI. Conclusion(S): A greater heterogeneity of maturity was found in the population of oocyte stages that were present after the antagonist protocol. Matured oocytes retrieved from small follicles generated embryos of lower developmental potential than oocytes derived from larger follicles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据