4.5 Article

A two-phase analysis of solute partitioning into the stratum corneum

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 95, 期 3, 页码 649-666

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20549

关键词

stratum corneum (SC); partition coefficient; microstructure; intercellular lipid; corneocyte; hydration; keratin protein; binding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An analysis is presented of partition coefficients K-SC/w, describing solute distribution into fully hydrated stratum corneum (SC) from dilute aqueous solution (w). A comprehensive database is compiled from the experimental literature covering more than eight decades in the octanol/water partition coefficient K-o/w. It is analyzed according to a two-phase model following that of Anderson, Raykar, and coworkers (1988, 1989), which accounts for uptake by intercellular lipid and corneocyte (keratin plus water) phases having inherently different lipophilicities, as characterized by an SC lipid/water partition coefficient K-lip/w and a partition coefficient PCpro/wp quantifying cornoeocyte-phase binding. Regression of 72 data points yields useful best-fit recalibrations of power laws (or linear free energy relationships) giving K-lip/w and PCpro/w as functions of K-o/w. The specific conclusions of the analysis are as follows: W The two-phase model offers substantial improvements over previously proposed analytical representations of K-SC/w, yielding an rms error in log(10)K(SC/w) of 0.30 limited by the scatter in the data. (ii) The best-fit description of the lipid phase is given by the power law K-lip/w = 0.43 (K-o/w)(0.81), suggesting about half the absolute value of Klip/w relative to previous estimates. (iii) The best-fit description of corneocyte-phase binding differs negligibly from the correlation found by Anderson, Raykar, and coworkers for the more limited set of compounds studied by them. Explicit consideration of the two-phase nature of the SC also furnishes a rational basis for predicting the Effects of varying hydration state upon K-SC/w. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据