4.7 Article

Lyman break galaxies at z=4-6 in cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09730.x

关键词

methods : numerical; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; cosmology : theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We perform a spectrophotometric analysis of galaxies at redshifts z = 4-6 in cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations of a Lambda cold dark matter universe. Our models include radiative cooling and heating by a uniform ultraviolet (UV) background, star formation, supernova feedback, and a phenomenological model for galactic winds. Analysing a series of simulations of varying box size and particle number allows us to isolate the impact of numerical resolution on our results. Specifically, we determine the luminosity functions in B, V, R, i' and z' filters, and compare the results with observational surveys of Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) performed with the Subaru telescope and the Hubble Space Telescope. We find that the simulated galaxies have UV colours consistent with observations and fall in the expected region of the colour-colour diagrams used by the Subaru group. The stellar masses of the most massive galaxies in our largest simulation increase their stellar mass from M-star similar to 10(11) M-circle dot at z = 6 to M-star similar to 10(11.7) M(circle dot)at z= 3. Assuming a uniform extinction of E(B-V) = 0.15, we also find reasonable agreement between simulations and observations in the space density of UV bright galaxies at z = 3-6, down to the magnitude limit of each survey. For the same moderate extinction level of E(B-V) similar to 0.15, the simulated luminosity functions match observational data, but have a steep faint-end slope with alpha similar to -2.0. We discuss the implications of the steep faint-end slope found in the simulations. Our results confirm the generic conclusion from earlier numerical studies that UV bright LBGs at z >= 3 are the most massive galaxies with E(B-V) similar to 0.15 at each epoch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据