4.7 Article

Risk and protective factors for thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a large, multi-ethnic cohort

期刊

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 68, 期 2, 页码 238-241

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.093013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Arthritis Foundation Post-Doctoral Fellowship Award
  2. Kirkland Scholar Award
  3. NIH [R01 AR22804, K24 AR02175, P60 AR0533008]
  4. National Center for Research Resources [5 M01 RR-00079]
  5. US Public Health Service

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Few studies have examined thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), none have included Asian-Americans, and most have had small sample sizes. We analysed risk factors for thrombosis in a large, multi-ethnic SLE cohort. Methods: We studied 1930 SLE subjects, including Caucasians, African-Americans, Asian-Americans and Hispanics. Data were derived from questionnaires and medical records. Documented history of thrombosis was the primary outcome. Explanatory variables included age at SLE diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, disease duration, smoking, antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) status, nephritis and specific medications. Results: Smoking (OR 1.26, p = 0.011), longer disease duration (OR 1.26 per 5 years p = 0.027 x 10(-7)), nephritis (OR 1.35, p = 0.036), aPL positivity (OR 3.22, p < 10(-9)) and immunomodulating medication use (OR 1.40, p = 0.011) were statistically significant risk factors for thrombosis. Younger age at SLE onset was protective (OR 0.52 for age <= 20, p = 0.001). After adjusting for disease severity and incorporating propensity scores, hydroxy-chloroquine use remained significantly protective for thrombosis (OR 0.62, p = 4.91 x 10(-4)). Conclusions: This study confirms that older age at onset, longer disease duration, smoking, aPL positivity, history of nephritis and immunomodulating medication use are risk factors for thrombosis in SLE. These data are the first to confirm in a large and ethnically diverse SLE cohort that hydroxychloroquine use is protective for thrombosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据