4.5 Article

Effects of intranasal insulin on cognition in memory-impaired older adults: Modulation by APOE genotype

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 451-458

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.03.016

关键词

cognition; Alzheimer's disease; diabetes; memory; glucose

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P50 AG 05136] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Raising insulin acutely in the periphery and in brain improves verbal memory. Intranasal insulin administration, which raises insulin acutely in the CNS without raising plasma insulin levels, provides an opportunity to determine whether these effects are mediated by central insulin or peripheral processes. Based on prior research with intravenous insulin, we predicted that the treatment response would differ between subjects with (epsilon 4+) and without (epsilon 4-) the APOE-epsilon 4 allele. On separate mornings, 26 memory-impaired subjects (13 with early Alzheimer's disease and 13 with amnestic mild cognitive impairment) and 35 normal controls each underwent three intranasal treatment conditions consisting of saline (placebo) or insulin (20 or 40 1U). Cognition was tested 15 min post-treatment, and blood was acquired at baseline and 45 min after treatment. Intranasal insulin treatment did not change plasma insulin or glusose levels. Insulin treatment facilitated recall on two measures of verbal memory in memory-impaired epsilon 4- adults. These effects were stronger for niernory-impaired epsilon 4- subjects than for memory-impaired epsilon 4+ subjects and normal adults. Unexpectedly, memory-impaired epsilon 4+ subjects showed poorer recall following insulin administration on one test of memory. These findings suggest that intranasal insulin administration may have therapeutic benefit without the risk of peripheral hypoglycemia and provide further evidence for apolipoprotein E (APOE) related differences in insulin metabolism. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据