4.7 Article

Syntheses and evaluation of gas transport properties in polystyrene-POSS membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 271, 期 1-2, 页码 94-100

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.07.014

关键词

gas permeability; polystyrene; PSPOSS composite membranes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copolymers based on styrene and a nanostructured polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane, PSPOSS, were synthesized and their gas permeability coefficients, P(i), to O-2 and N-2 were measured at 2.0265 x 10(5) Pa (2 atm) and 35 degrees C in a standard permeation cell. The syntheses of the copolymers were carried out using styrene and different loads of the macro initiator POSS-TEMPO which was also synthesized in this work. The gas transport results show that the gas permeability coefficients in the PSPOSS polymers increases with the amount of the POSS-TEMPO used in the synthesis, but interestingly, for relatively low concentrations, i.e. up to 10 wt.%, the selectivity for the gas pair O-2/N-2 does not show dramatic losses in the selectivity. The P(O-2) for pure PS, which is 21.75145 x 10(-18) m(2) s(-1) Pa-1 (2.9 Barrer) with 5.6 O-2/N-2 selectivity, increases to 37.5025 x 10(-18) m(2) s(-1) Pa-1 (5.0 Barrer) and the selectivity still remains as high as 5.2 for a PSPOSS synthesized with a 10 wt.% load of the macro initiator. When the PSPOSS is synthesized with higher loads of the macro initiator, i.e. 20 wt.%, there are impressive increases in permeability with decreases in the O-2/N-2 selectivity. After factorization of the permeability coefficients into the diffusivity and solubility factors, it is observed that having POSS units in the copolymer affect the perm-selectivity of the PS membranes. This effect can be attributed to changes in the gas diffusivity rather than changes in the solubility coefficients for PS synthesized with up to 10 wt.% of POSS-TEMPO. Higher loads of the POSS-TEMPO in the PSPOSS membranes increase both the diffusivity and selectivity coefficients. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据