3.9 Article

Laser capture microdissection of epithelial cancers guided by antibodies against fibroblast activation protein and endosialin

期刊

DIAGNOSTIC MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 35-42

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00019606-200603000-00006

关键词

immuno-laser capture microdissection; cancer stroma markers; FAP alpha; endosialin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcriptional profiling of cancer biopsies is used extensively to identify expression signatures for specific cancer types, diagnostic and prognostic subgroups, and novel molecular targets for therapy. To broaden these applications, several challenges remain. For example, the integrity of RNA extracted even from small tissue samples has to be insured and monitored. Moreover, total tumor RNA may hide the marked histologic heterogeneity of human cancers. A principle approach to this heterogeneity has been provided by laser capture microdissection performed on anti body-stained tissue sections (immuno-LCM; iLCM). In this study, we have established a procedure to assess the quality of RNA obtained from tissue sections, coupled with immunostaining using antibodies to different tumor stromal markers, and subsequent iLCM to selectively capture the cancer stroma compartments. The procedure was applied to 53 frozen specimens of human epithelial cancers. Sections were stained for histopathological evaluation, and RNA was isolated from adjacent serial sections. RNA quality was assessed by the Agilent-Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA) and by multiplex RT-PCR. Two thirds of the specimens were found to yield good to excellent RNA quality. For microdissection of the tumor stroma with reactive fibroblasts and tumor blood vessels, a rapid incubation protocol with antibodies against fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and against endosialin was developed to ensure RNA integrity for subsequent iLCM. Using these procedures, RNA from distinct tumor compartments can be isolated, analyzed, amplified, and used for transcription profiling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据