4.2 Article

Hepatic iron, liver steatosis and viral genotypes in patients with chronic hepatitis C

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 199-205

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2005.00662.x

关键词

HCV genotypes; hepatic iron; hepatitis C; serum ferritin; steatosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatic iron has been described in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection as an important cofactor of disease outcome. The mechanisms leading to hepatic iron deposits (HIDs) in HCV patients are partially understood. We investigated HIDs in the liver biopsies of a consecutive series of 242 HCV-infected patients with well-compensated liver disease. Serum ferritin was elevated in 20.7% and transferrin saturation in 19.0%, while 38.8% had stainable HIDs indicating that serum markers of systemic iron overload have low sensitivity in predicting HIDs in hepatitis C. A cut-off value of serum ferritin (350 mu g/L in females and 450 mu g/L in males) had good negative predictive value in excluding presence of mild-moderate HIDs (grade II-III). Hepatic iron deposits correlated by multivariate analysis with serum ferritin [odds ratio (OR) 1.008, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.005-1.011] and albumin (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.297). Hepatic iron deposits were more frequent in HCV-3-infected cases than in other genotypes (P = 0.027) while raised serum iron indices were more frequent in non-HCV-3 genotypes (P = 0.02). Furthermore, advanced fibrosis (F3-F4 by METAVIR) was more frequent in non-HCV-3 genotypes (P = 0.04). In HCV-3 cases there was a close association between HIDs and severe (grade II-III) steatosis (P < 0.00001). These results indicate that in well-compensated chronic hepatitis C HIDs are strongly associated with HCV-3 and viral-induced hepatic steatosis, while in the presence of other genotypes they might merely reflect a more advanced stage of liver disease and/or a systemic iron overload. Serum ferritin could identify a subgroup of patients in which the need of venesection could be excluded without liver biopsy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据