4.6 Article

Cyclophilin a and TRIM5α independently regulate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity in human cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 80, 期 6, 页码 2855-2862

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.80.6.2855-2862.2006

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI036199, R01AI36199] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyclophilin A (CypA), a cytoplasmic, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) CA-binding protein, acts after virion membrane fusion with human cells to increase HIV-1 infectivity. HIV-1 CA is similarly greeted by CypA soon after entry into rhesus macaque or African green monkey cells, where, paradoxically, the interaction decreases HIV-1 infectivity by facilitating TRIM5 alpha-mediated restriction. These observations conjure a model in which CA recognition by the human TRIM5 alpha orthologue is precluded by CypA. Consistent with the model, selection of a human cell line for decreased restriction of the TRIM5 alpha-sensitive, N-tropic murine leukemia virus (N-MLV) rendered HIV-1 transduction of these cells independent of CypA. Additionally, HIV-1 virus-like particles (VLPs) saturate N-MLV restriction activity, particularly when the CA-CypA interaction is disrupted. Here the effects of CypA and TRIM5 alpha on HIV-1 restriction were examined directly. RNA interference was used to show that endogenous human TRIM5 alpha does indeed restrict HIV-1, but the magnitude of this antiviral activity was not altered by disruption of the CA-CypA interaction or by elimination of CypA protein. Conversely, the stimulatory effect of CypA on HIV-1 infectivity was completely independent of human TRIM5 alpha. Together with previous reports, these data suggest that CypA protects HIV-1 from an unknown antiviral activity in human cells. Additionally, target cell permissivity increased after loading with heterologous VLPs, consistent with a common saturable target that is epistatic to both TRIM5 alpha and the putative CypA-regulated restriction factor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据