4.3 Article

Habitat segregation of a functional gene encoding nitrate ammonification in estuarine sediments

期刊

GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 75-87

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01490450500533866

关键词

DNRA; estuarine sediment; environmental gradient; distribution; nitrate ammonification; nrfA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distribution and diversity of nrfA gene encoding dissimilatory nitrite reduction to ammonium (DNRA) in the sediments of the Colne River, North Essex, UK, were investigated. Sequencing cloned nrfA fragments amplified from environmental DNA enabled structure analysis of the bacterial community responsible for this pathway. The DNA was extracted from the sediment samples at different depths from the estuary ranging from fresh water to seawater regions, and amplified using specific PCR primer pairs targeting for the nrfA gene. Analysis of the nrfA clones showed two distinct clusters corresponding to their origins, namely, divided into the stable sites ( marine and freshwater regions) and the unstable sites ( brackish water region), where the tidal rise and fall constantly disturbs the environmental conditions. In addition, the nrfA clones from the deeper layer of the sediment formed a more homogenous community than those from the surface layer of the sediment. This may be due to more isolated and anaerobic conditions kept in the deeper sediment less influenced by the overlying water and other environmental factors. Most of the nrfA clones from the Colne estuarine sediments formed several distinct clusters including known nitrate ammonifiers such as Aeromonas, Shewanella, Desulfovibrio and Sulfurospillum. One of which was, however, related to Bacteroides but still quite divergent (similar to 70% identity) and the rest forming unknown clusters of supposedly uncultured members of bacteria. This is the first trial to describe the nrfA partial sequences derived from a natural environment, with reference to their habitat-specific community structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据