4.6 Article

Inactivation of Escherichia coli with power ultrasound in apple cider

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 E102-E108

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.tb08890.x

关键词

power ultrasound; Escherichia coli; apple cider; cell morphology; quality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of acoustic energy to secure apple cider safety was explored. Inactivation tests were performed with Escherichia coli K12 at 40 degrees C, 45 degrees C, 50 degrees C, 55 degrees C, and 60 degrees C with and without ultrasound, followed by a validation test with E. coli O157:H7 at 60 degrees C. The cell morphology was observed with environmental scanning electron microscopy for samples treated at 40 degrees C and 60 degrees C. Physical quality attributes of the apple cider (pH, titratable acidity, degrees Brix, turbidity, and color) were compared for treated samples. The inactivation tests showed that sonication increased E. coli K12 cell destruction by 5.3-log, 5.0-log, and 0.1-log cycles at 40 degrees C, 50 degrees C, and 60 degrees C, respectively. The additional destruction due to sonication was more pronounced at sublethal temperatures. At the lethal temperature of 60 degrees C, the rate of death by ultrasound was not significantly different compared with the thermal-alone treatment. The inactivation of E. coli K12 with heat was described by 1st-order kinetics, especially at 50 degrees C and 60 degrees C. For ultrasound treatments, concave upward survival curves were observed, which had a shape factor in the range of 0.547 to 0.720 for a Weibull distribution model. Extensive damage for ultrasound treated E. coli K12 cells, including cell perforation, was observed. Perforation is a unique phenomenon found on ultrasound-treated cells that could be caused by liquid jets generated by cavitation. Titratable acidity pH, and degrees Brix of the cider were not affected by ultrasound treatment. Minor changes in color and turbidity for ultrasound treated samples, especially for sonication at 40 degrees C for 17.7 min, were observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据