4.7 Article

Evidence from photosynthetic characteristics for the hybrid origin of Diplotaxis muralis from a C3-C4 intermediate and a C3 species

期刊

PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 253-259

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-873050

关键词

CO2 gas exchange; leaf anatomy; hybrid speciation; glycine decarboxylase; Diplotaxis muralis; C-3-C-4 intermediate species; C-3 species

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artificial hybridization studies have been carried out between plants with different photosynthetic types to study the genetic mechanism of photosynthetic types. However, there are only few reports describing the possibility of natural hybridization between plants with different photosynthetic types. A previous cytological and morphological study suggested that a cruciferous allotetraploid species, Diplotaxis muralis (L.) DC. (2n=42), originated from natural hybridization between D. tenuifolia (L.) DC. (2n=22) and D. viminea (L.) DC. (2n=20). These putative parents have recently been reported to be a C-3-C-4 intermediate and a C-3 species, respectively. if this hybridization occurred, D. muralis should have characteristics intermediate between those of the C-3-C-4 intermediate and C-3 types. We compared leaf structures and photosynthetic characteristics of the three species. The bundle sheath (BS) cells in D. tenuifolia included many centripetally located chloroplasts and mitochondria, but those of D. viminea had only a few organelles. The BS cells in D. muralis displayed intermediate features between the putative parents. Glycine decarboxylase P protein was confined to the BS mitochondria in D. tenuifolia, but accumulated mainly in the mesophyll mitochondria in D. viminea. In D. muralis, it accumulated in both the BS and the mesophyll mitochondria. Values Of CO2 compensation point and its response to changing light intensity were also intermediate between the putative parents. These data support the theory that D. muralis was created by natural hybridization between species with different photosynthetic types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据