4.6 Article

The Space Interferometry Mission astrometric grid giant star survey.: I.: Stellar parameters and radial velocity variability

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 131, 期 3, 页码 1784-1796

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/500243

关键词

stars : abundances; stars : fundamental parameters; stars : late type; stars : oscillations; techniques : radial velocities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present results from a campaign of multiple-epoch echelle spectroscopy of relatively faint ( V 9: 5 13: 5 mag) red giants observed as potential astrometric grid stars for the Space Interferometry Mission (SIM PlanetQuest). Data are analyzed for 775 stars selected from the GridGiant Star Survey, spanning a wide range of effective temperatures (T-eff), gravities, and metallicities. The spectra are used to determine these stellar parameters and to monitor radial velocity (RV) variability at the 100ms(-1) level. The degree of RV variation measured for 489 stars observed two or more times is explored as a function of the inferred stellar parameters. The percentage of RV-unstable stars is found to be very high-about two-thirds of our sample. It is found that the fraction of RV-stable red giants (at the 100 m s(-1) level) is higher among stars with T-eff similar to 4500 K, corresponding to the calibration-independent range of infrared colors 0.59 < (J-K-s)(0) < 0.73. A higher percentage of RV-stable stars is found if additional constraints of surface gravity and metallicity ranges, 2: 3 < log g < 3.2 and < -0.5 < [Fe/H] < -0.1, respectively, are applied. Selection of stars based on only photometric values of effective temperature ( 4300 K < T-eff < 4700 K) is a simple and effective way to increase the fraction of RV-stable stars. The optimal selection of RV-stable stars, especially in the case in which the Washington photometry is unavailable, can rely effectively on the 2MASS colors constraint 0.59 < (J - K-s)(0) < 0.73. These results have important ramifications for the use of giant stars as astrometric references for the SIM PlanetQuest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据