4.6 Article

Trimegestone differentially modulates the expression of matrix metalloproteinases in the endometrial stromal cell

期刊

MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 157-167

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gal014

关键词

endometrium; HRT; metalloproteinases; progesterone; trimegestone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are considered to be of critical importance in the initiation of menstruation where MMP protein levels are reciprocally modulated by the actions of the gonadal steroid hormones, estradiol (E-2) and progesterone (P4), with P4 being considered the principal suppressor of endometrial MMP expression. Trimegestone (T) is a novel progestagen that tightly controls menstruation timing and duration through mechanisms that might involve MMP suppression. Endometrial stromal cells treated with 10(-6) M E-2, P4 or T in the presence and absence of 10(-6)M RU486 showed that both T and P4 suppressed the expression of MMP-1 and MMP-3 transcripts and secreted protein, whereas MMP-9 was not produced in culture. The suppressive effect of T or P4 on MMP-1 and MMP-3 transcript levels was enhanced in the presence of E-2 and attenuated in the presence of RU486, although MMP-1 proteins were unaffected by the presence of RU486, which alone acted as a partial progesterone agonist in these cultures. Immunohistochemistry with MMP-1, MMP-3 and MMP-9-specific antibodies performed on endometrial biopsies obtained from non-treated, LH-dated, normally cycling women and endometrial biopsies obtained from postmenopausal women treated with T-based HRT showed that immunoreactive MMP-1 and MMP-3 was higher in the menstrual phase, whilst MMP-9 expression was higher in the late luteal phase (P = 0.03) and T significantly inhibited the presence of MMP-9(+) cells. These data suggest that T acts in a similar manner to P4, but causes subtle differences in expression patterns of MMPs that may explain the different clinical effect that this progestagen has on endometrial behaviour compared to P4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据