4.6 Article

The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) family member PNQALRE/CCRK supports cell proliferation but has no intrinsic CDK-activating kinase (CAK) activity

期刊

CELL CYCLE
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 546-554

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cc.5.5.2541

关键词

cell cycle; cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK); CDK-activating kinase (CAK); Cdk7; PNQALRE/CCRK; apoptosis; RNAi; chemical genetics; analog-sensitive kinase

资金

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB001987] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM56985] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that drive the eukaryotic cell cycle must be phosphorylated within the activation segment (T-loop) by a CDK-activating kinase (CAK) to achieve full activity. Although a requirement for CDK-activating phosphorylation is conserved throughout eukaryotic evolution, CAK itself has diverged between metazoans and budding yeast, and fission yeast has two CAKs, raising the possibility that additional mammalian enzymes remain to be identified. We report here the characterization of PNQALRE (also known as CCRK or p42), a member of the mammalian CDK family most similar to the cell-cycle effectors Cdk1 and Cdk2 and to the CAK, Cdk7. Although PNQALRE/CCRK was recently proposed to activate Cdk2, we show that the monomeric protein has no intrinsic CAK activity. Depletion of PNQALRE by > 80% due to RNA interference (RNAi) impairs cell proliferation, but fails to arrest the cell cycle at a discrete point. Instead, both the fraction of cells with a sub-G(1) DNA content and cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) increase. PNQALRE knockdown did not diminish Cdk2 T-loop phosphorylation in vivo or decrease CAK activity of a cell extract. In contrast, depletion of Cdk7 by RNAi causes a proportional decrease in the ability of an extract to activate recombinant Cdk2. Our data do not support the proposed function of PNQALRE/CCRK in activating CDKs, but instead reinforce the notion of Cdk7 as the major, and to date the only, CAK in mammalian cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据