4.4 Article

A new method to determine electrostatic potential around a macromolecule in solution from molecular wave functions

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 453-462

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20356

关键词

electrostatic potential; macromolecule; molecular wave function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three-dimensional reference interaction site model integral equation theory (3D-RISM) combined with the ab initio molecular orbital method (3D-RISM-SCF) is applied to a solvated macromolecular system. The solvation structure around a solute molecule is obtained from the 3D-RISM integral equation under the electrostatic potential of the solute molecule, calculated by the ab initio molecular orbital theory. The electrostatic potential should be calculated on each grid point in the three-dimensional real space. Therefore, the calculation of the electrostatic potential is the most time consuming part in this method. In this article, we propose a new procedure to save the computational cost for calculating the electrostatic potential and the solvated fock matrix. The strategy of this procedure is to evaluate the electrostatic potential and the solvated fock matrix in different ways, depending on the distance between solute and solvent. Inside the repulsive cores of solute atoms, it is possible to avoid the calculation of electrostatic potential and solvated Fock matrix by assuming the potential to be infinity. In the region sufficiently far from solute, they are evaluated classically by putting the effective point charge on each atom. In the intermediate region, the electrostatic potential is evaluated directly by integrating the molecular orbitals of the solute molecule. The electronic structure and the energy gradient of Methionine-Enkephalin and solvation structure are estimated by using this procedure in aqueous solution, and are compared with the results from other procedures. The results are compared also with those from the continuum model. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据