4.3 Review

Intracrine signaling through lipid mediators and their cognate nuclear G-protein-coupled receptors:: a paradigm based on PGE2, PAF, and LPA1 receptors

期刊

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/Y05-147

关键词

prostaglandins; PAF; LPA; G proteins; receptors; signaling; localization; gene transcription; endothelial cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostaglandins (PGs), platelet-activating factor (PAF). and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) are ubiquitous lipid mediators that play important roles in inflammation. cardiovascular homeostasis. and immunity and are also known to modulate gene expression of specific pro-inflammatory genes. The mechanism of action of these lipids is thought to be primarily dependent on their specific plasma membrane receptors belonging to the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Increasing evidence suggests the existence of a functional intracellular GPCR population. It has been proposed that immediate effects are mediated via cell surface receptors whereas long-term responses are dependent upon intracellular receptor effects. Indeed. receptors for PAF. LPA. and PGE, (specifically EP1, EP3, and EP4) localize at the cell nucleus of cerebral microvascular endothelial cells of new born pigs. rat hepatocytes, and cells overexpressing each receptor. Stimulation of isolated nuclei with these lipids reveals biological functions including transcriptional regulation of major genes, namely c-fos, cylooxygenase-2, and endothelial as well as inducible nitric oxide synthase. In the present review. we shall focus on the nuclear localization and signaling of GPCRs recognizing PGE(2), PAF, and LPA phospholipids as ligands. Mechanisms on how nuclear PGE(2). PAF and LPA receptors activate gene transcription and nuclear localization pathways are presented. Intracrine signaling for lipid mediators Uncover novel pathways to elicit their effects: accordingly. intracellular GPCRs constitute a distinctive mode of action for gene regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据