4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Macrophages, reactive nitrogen species, and lung injury

期刊

OXIDATIVE/NITROSATIVE STRESS AND DISEASE
卷 1203, 期 -, 页码 60-65

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05607.x

关键词

macrophages; ozone; nitric oxide; caveolin; TNF alpha

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [ES004738, GM034310, CA132624, AR055073, HL086621, ES005022]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA132624] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL086621] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [U54AR055073] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P30ES005022, T32ES007148, R01ES004738] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM034310] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence has accumulated over the past several years demonstrating that lung injury following inhalation of irritants like ozone is due, not only to direct effects of the chemical, but also indirectly to the actions of inflammatory mediators released by infiltrating macrophages. Among the mediators involved in the cytotoxic process, reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are of particular interest because of their well-documented cytotoxic potential. Findings that macrophage suppression blocks RNS production and ozone-induced toxicity provide strong support for a role of these cells and inflammatory mediators in lung injury. Recent investigations have focused on understanding pathways by which macrophages become activated to release RNS. One protein that has attracted considerable attention is caveolin-1, a membrane scaffolding molecule that functions to negatively regulate cell signaling. The fact that expression of caveolin-1 is down-regulated in macrophages after ozone inhalation suggests a mechanism controlling the release of cytotoxic mediators by these inflammatory cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据