4.8 Article

RhoB facilitates c-Myc turnover by supporting efficient nuclear accumulation of GSK-3

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 1281-1289

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209174

关键词

Ras; Rho; Akt; cancer

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA82222, R01 CA100123, CA100123] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The small GTPase RhoB suppresses cancer in part by limiting cell proliferation. However, the mechanisms it uses to achieve this are poorly understood. Recent studies link RhoB to trafficking of Akt, which through its regulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) has an important role in controlling the stability of the c-Myc oncoprotein. c-Myc stabilization may be a root feature of human tumorigenesis as it phenocopies an essential contribution of SV40 small T antigen in human cell transformation. In this study we show that RhoB directs efficient turnover of c-Myc in established or transformed mouse fibroblasts and that the attenuation of RhoB which occurs commonly in human cancer is a sufficient cause to elevate c-Myc levels. Increased levels of c-Myc elicited by RhoB deletion increased the proliferation of nullizygous cells, whereas restoring RhoB in null cells decreased the stability of c-Myc and restrained cell proliferation. Mechanistic analyses indicated that RhoB facilitated nuclear accumulation of GSK-3 and GSK-3-mediated phosphorylation of c-Myc T58, the critical site for ubiquitination and degradation of c-Myc. RhoB deletion restricted nuclear localization of GSK-3, reduced T58 phosphorylation, and stabilized c-Myc. These effects were not associated with changes in phosphorylation or localization of Akt, however, differences were observed in phosphorylation and localization of the GSK-3 regulatory Akt-related kinase, serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible protein kinase (SGK). The ability of RhoB to support GSK-3-dependent turnover of c-Myc offers a mechanism by which RhoB acts to limit the proliferation of neoplastically transformed cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据