4.7 Article

The Role of Sleep in Cognition and Emotion

期刊

YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE 2009
卷 1156, 期 -, 页码 168-197

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04416.x

关键词

sleep; learning; memory; encoding; consolidation; association; integration; plasticity; emotion; affect; non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep; rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep; offline; slow wave sleep (SWS), slow-wave activity (SWA), sleep spindles

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [MH069935]
  2. American Academy of Sleep Medicine
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R03MH069935] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As critical as waking brain function is to cognition, an extensive literature now indicates that sleep supports equally important, different yet complementary operations. This review will consider recent and emerging findings implicating sleep and specific sleep-stage physiologies in the modulation, regulation, and even preparation of cognitive and emotional brain processes. First, evidence for the role of sleep in memory processing will be discussed, principally focusing on declarative memory. Second, at a neural level several mechanistic models of sleep-dependent plasticity underlying these effects will be reviewed, with a synthesis of these features offered that may explain the ordered structure of sleep, and the orderly evolution of memory stages. Third, accumulating evidence for the role of sleep in associative memory processing will be discussed, suggesting that the long-term goal of sleep may not be the strengthening of individual memory items, but, instead, their abstracted assimilation into a schema of generalized knowledge. Fourth, the newly emerging benefit of sleep in regulating emotional brain reactivity will be considered. Finally, and building on this latter topic, a novel hypothesis and framework of sleep-dependent affective brain processing will be proposed, culminating in testable predictions and translational implications for mood disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据