4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Involvement of Reactive Oxygen Species in Apoptosis Induced by Pharmacological Inhibition of Protein Kinase CK2

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04916.x

关键词

human leukemia cells; CK2; apoptosis; ROS

资金

  1. National Medical Research Council
  2. Biomedical Research Council of Singapore
  3. National Cancer Institute [CA-15062]
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R37CA015062, R01CA015062, U01CA015062] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. Veterans Affairs [I01BX001731] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been reported that inhibition of protein kinase CK2 (CK2) with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) is a potent inducer of apoptosis in cancer cells but not in normal cells. In this regard, the apoptotic-inducing effect is attributed to the catalytic activity of the enzyme, which phosphorylates proapoptotic proteins to inhibit their functions. In this study we investigate the role of intracellular redox status in the proapoptotic activity of CK2 inhibition in human leukemia Cem cells. We provide evidence that inhibition of CK2 activity induces apoptotic cell death as evident by activation of caspase 3, DNA fragmentation, and phosphatidylserine externalization. Inhibition of CK2 resulted in a significant increase in intracellular hydrogen peroxide production, which we show as a critical mediator of apoptosis. To that end, apoptotic hallmarks, like DNA fragmentation and phosphatidylserine externalization, were blocked with the specific hydrogen peroxide scavenger catalase. We also show that inhibition of CK2 reduces cytosolic intracellular superoxide, a precursor of hydrogen peroxide. In summary, decreasing CK2 activity increases intracellular hydrogen peroxide, creating an intracellular environment conducive for death execution. Taken together, these data provide information on novel pathways involved in CK2 biology with implications for effective tools against drug-resistant tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据