4.6 Article

Divergent mechanisms utilized by SOCS3 to mediate interleukin-10 inhibition of tumor necrosis factor α and nitric oxide production by macrophages

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 10, 页码 6316-6324

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M508608200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10) potently inhibits macrophage function through activation of the transcription factor STAT3. The expression of SOCS3 ( suppressor of cytokine signaling-3) has been shown to be induced by IL-10 in a STAT3-dependent manner. However, the relevance of SOCS3 expression to the anti-inflammatory effect of IL-10 on macrophages has been controversial. Through kinetic analysis of the requirement for SOCS3 in IL-10 inhibition of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF alpha) transcription and translation, SOCS3 was found to be necessary for TNF alpha expression during the early phase, but not the late phase of IL-10 action. SOCS3 was essential for IL-10 inhibition of LPS-stimulated production of iNOS ( inducible nitric-oxide synthase) protein and nitric oxide ( NO). To determine the domains of SOCS3 protein important in mediating these effects, SOCS3(-/-) macrophages were reconstituted with SOCS3 mutated for the SH2, KIR, SOCS box domains, and tyrosines 204 (Tyr(204)) and 221 (Tyr(221)). The SH2 domain, SOCS box, and both Tyr(204) and Tyr(221) were required for IL-10 inhibition of TNF alpha mRNA and protein expression, but interestingly the KIR domain was necessary only for IL-10 inhibition of TNF alpha protein expression. In contrast, Tyr204 and Tyr221 were the only structural features of SOCS3 that were necessary in mediating IL-10 inhibition of iNOS protein expression and NO production. These data define SOCS3 as an important mediator of IL-10 inhibition of macrophage activation and that SOCS3 interferes with distinct LPS-stimulated signal transduction events through differing mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据