4.8 Article

Utilizing full-exchange capacity of zeolites by alkaline leaching:: Preparation of Fe-ZSM5 and application in N2O decomposition

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 238, 期 2, 页码 250-259

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2005.11.034

关键词

N2O decomposition; zeolite ion-exchange; desilication; caustic washing; alkali treatment; postsynthesis modification; mesopore formation; alkali treatment; ZSM5

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilization of the full exchange capacity of zeolites has been achieved by shortening diffusional lengths on a mild alkaline leaching treatment. Iron was fully incorporated by liquid-phase, ion exchange on ZSM5 without the formation of Fe-oxides, leading to improved activity in the N2O-exchange decomposition reaction. It is demonstrated that the large crystal size of the zeolite dominates the Fe-III-process. The crystallinity of the ZSM5 zeolite can be tuned down by postsynthesis modification of commercial samples by caustic leaching. Under the Study conditions, two phenomena were observed: (i) The size of the zeolite agglomerates is significantly reduced while the microporosity is preserved, and (ii) at prolonged treatment, an additional mesopore network is created. The mesopores display a wide pore size distribution with randomly organized rnesopores. The MFI lattice is well preserved in both cases. Based on the characterisation data and activity results. it is concluded that deagglomeration of the zeolite crystals enables full exchange. The newly created mesopores at harsher conditions are not responsible for the improved exchange. At short leaching times, full-exchange loading of Fe-III is achieved (and negligible inactive FeOx), leading to a considerable enhancement of the activity for N2O decomposition. Mesopore formation does not further improve the performance of N2O decomposition. From the activity increase, it is concluded that a Fraction of the extra Fe becomes active, which increases with the exchange degree. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据