4.7 Article

Protein trans-splicing and characterization of a split family B-type DNA polymerase from the hyperthermophilic archaeal parasite Nanoarchaeum equitans

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 356, 期 5, 页码 1093-1106

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.036

关键词

protein trans-splicing; Nanoarchaeum equitans; nanoarchaeon; family B-type DNA polymerase; biochemical characterization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoarchaeum equitans family B-type DNA polymerase (Neq DNA polymerase) is encoded by two separate genes, the large gene coding for the N-terminal part (Neq L) of Neq DNA polymerase and the small gene coding for the C-terminal part (Neq S), including a split mini-intein sequence. The two Neq DNA polymerase genes were cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli individually, together (for the Neq C), and as a genetically protein splicing-processed form (Neq P). The protein trans-spliced Neq C was obtained using the heating step at 80 degrees C after the co-expression of the two genes. The protein trans-splicing of the N-terminal and C-terminal parts of Neq DNA polymerase was examined in vitro using the purified Neq L and Neq S. The trans-splicing was influenced mainly by temperature, and occurred only at temperatures above 50 degrees C. The trans-splicing reaction was inhibited in the presence of zinc. Neq S has no catalytic activity and Neq L has lower 3'-5' exonuclease activity; whereas Neq C and Neq P have polymerase and 3'-5' exonuclease activities, indicating that both Neq L and Neq S are needed to form the active DNA polymerase that possesses higher proofreading activity. The genetically protein splicing-processed Neq P showed the same properties as the protein trans-spliced Neq C. Our results are the first evidence to show experimentally that natural protein trans-splicing occurs in an archaeal protein, a thermostable protein, and a family B-type DNA polymerase. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据