4.7 Article

Hormones in the nucleus.: Immunologically demonstrable biogenic amines (serotonin, histamine) in the nucleus of rat peritoneal mast cells

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 78, 期 16, 页码 1871-1877

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.08.044

关键词

serotonin; histamine; nuclear localization; mast cell; EDAC-fixation; 5-HT inhibitors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using 1-ethyl-3 (3-dimethyl-aminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDAC) fixation and immunocytochemical confocal microscopic study, bright serotonin and histamine fluorescence appeared in the nucleus of rat peritoneal mast cells. In case of paraformaldehyde fixation, this was not observed. The phenomenon can be explained by the cross-linking effect of EDAC, which did not allow the efflux of biogenic amines from the nucleus. This means that biogenic amines are present in the nucleus of mast cells, and this is supported by the flow cytometric measurement data of the whole cell. Other hormones studied (triiodothyronine, insulin, and endorphin) were not present in the nucleus. Four pharmaca with biogenic amine-influencing character in the central nervous system were used for studying the relation between the external (surrounding and cytoplasmic) and nuclear biogenic amine content of mast cells. Fluoxetine, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor depleted nuclear as well as cytoplasmic serotonin content. Clorgyline, a MAO-A inhibitor, decreased cytoplasmic serotonin content and weakened nuclear serotonin fluorescence. The tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor, para-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA), and the mast cell degranulator, Compound 48/80, reduced cytoplasmic serotonin content without influencing nuclear content. Histamine fluorescence was influenced solely by fluoxetine. The results show that nuclear 5-HT content is dependent firstly of serotonin uptake and reuptake. To our knowledge, this is the first exact report on the presence of non-steroid-type-receptor-transported hormones inside the nucleus of a cell. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据