4.7 Article

The oxidation of 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin to reactive oxygen species:: A self-fulfilling prophesy?

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 968-975

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.10.042

关键词

peroxynitrite; peroxidase; DCF; DCFH; EPR; free radicals

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The oxidation of 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin (DCFH) and its diacetate form (DCFHDA) by the HRP/peroxynitrite system was investigated. Both DCFH and DCFHDA were oxidized to fluorescent products. A major anomaly, however, was the observation that fluorescence continued to build Lip long after peroxynitrite total decomposition and the initial HRP compound I reduction, suggesting the production of oxidants by the system. Indeed, preformed HRP compound I was instantly reduced by DCFH and DCFHDA to compound II with the obligate formation of DCF center dot- semiquinone and DCFHDA-derived radicals. Catalase strongly inhibited fluorescence and EPR signals, suggesting the intermediate formation of H2O2. Taken together the data indicate that peroxynitrite rapidly oxidizes HRP to HRP compound I, which is reduced by DCFH and its diacetate form with the concomitant formation of DCF center dot- semiquinone and DCFH DA-derived radicals. These are oxidized by O-2, producing O-2(center dot-) - (as demonstrated by EPR and oxygen consumption experiments), which dismutates to produce H2O2, which serves to fuel further DCFH/DCFHDA oxidation via HRP catalysis. Also DCFHDA was shown to be considerably more resistant to oxidation than its hydrolyzed product DCFH, presumably because of the absence of the easily oxidizable phenol moieties. DCFHDA/DCFH have been used to study free radical production in a variety of systems. Our findings demonstrate that this assay is subject to a serious artifact in that it produces what it is purported to measure; therefore, its use in biological systems should be approached with caution. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据