4.7 Article

Generation of highly purified and functionally active human TH1 cells against Aspergillus fumigatus

期刊

BLOOD
卷 107, 期 6, 页码 2562-2569

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1660

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Invasive aspergillosis remains a serious complication in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Since it became clear that lymphocytes provide a critical secondary defense against fungi, adoptive transfer of functionally active anti-Aspergillus T cells might be an option to restore adaptive immune effector mechanisms. Using the interferon (IFN)-gamma secretion assay, we isolated human activated T cells upon stimulation with a cellular extract of Aspergillus fumigatus. Culturing this cell population for 14 days, we obtained an average of 1.1 X 10(7) cells from a single 100-mL blood draw in 7 of 7 healthy individuals. Within another 14 days, these cells were expanded to an average number of 2.0 X 10(8) T-helper 1 (THII) cells secreting IFN-gamma on stimulation with Aspergillus antigens. Testing various fungal antigen extracts, similar proportions of IFN-gamma-producing CD3(+)/CD4(+) cells were obtained upon activation with antigen extracts of A fumigatus, A flavus, A niger, and Penicillium chrysogenum, whereas no significant IFN-gamma production was observed upon activation with antigen extracts of Alternaria alternata and Candida albicans. In addition, generated T cells were able to induce damage to A fumigatus hyphae, and significantly increased hyphal damage induced by human neutrophils. CD4(+) T-cell-mediated alloreactivity of generated anti-Aspergillus T cells was clearly reduced compared with that of the original cell population. In conclusion, we present a simple and feasible strategy for rapid generation of a high number of functional active T cells against Aspergilius from a single blood draw. Our data suggest that functionally active T cells against Aspergillus could be a promising treatment option for patients undergoing allogeneic SCT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据