4.5 Article

Small ubiquitin-like modifying protein isopeptidase assay based on poliovirus RNA polymerase activity

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 350, 期 2, 页码 214-221

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.11.001

关键词

isopeptidases; protein degradation; N terminus; 3D polymerase

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI045818, R01 AI045818-08] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R43 DK071391, 1 R43 DK071391] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R43 NS047948, 1R43 NS47948] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is the major nonlysosomal proteolytic system in eukaryotic cells responsible for regulating the level of many key regulatory molecules within the cells. Modification of cellular proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins, such as, plays an essential role in a number of biological schemes, and ubiquitin pathway small ubiquitin-like modifying protein (SUMO). enzymes have become important therapeutic targets. Ubiquitination is a dynamic reversible process; a multitude of ubiquitin ligases and deubiquitinases (DUBs) are responsible for the wide-ranging influence of this pathway as well as its selectivity. The DUB enzymes serve to maintain adequate pools of free ubiquitin and regulate the ubiquitination status of cellular proteins. Using SUMO fusions, a novel assay system, based on poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity, is described here. The method simplifies the isopeptidase assay and facilitates high-throughput analysis of these enzymes. The principle of the assay is the dependence of the viral polymerase on a free N terminus for activity; accordingly, the polymerase is inactive when fused at its N terminus to SUMO or any other ubiquitin-like protein. The assay is sensitive, reproducible, and adaptable to a high-throughput format for use in screens for inhibitors/activators of clinically relevant SUMO proteases and deubiquitinases. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据