4.5 Article

Occurrence of invasive pneumococcal disease and number of excess cases due to influenza

期刊

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-58

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Influenza is characterized by seasonal outbreaks, often with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. It is also known to be a cause of significant amount secondary bacterial infections. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the main pathogen causing secondary bacterial pneumonia after influenza and subsequently, influenza could participate in acquiring Invasive Pneumococcal Disease (IPD). Methods: In this study, we aim to investigate the relation between influenza and IPD by estimating the yearly excess of IPD cases due to influenza. For this purpose, we use influenza periods as an indicator for influenza activity as a risk factor in subsequent analysis. The statistical modeling has been made in two modes. First, we constructed two negative binomial regression models. For each model, we estimated the contribution of influenza in the models, and calculated number of excess number of IPD cases. Also, for each model, we investigated several lag time periods between influenza and IPD. Secondly, we constructed an influenza free baseline, and calculated differences in IPD data ( observed cases) and baseline ( expected cases), in order to estimate a yearly additional number of IPD cases due to influenza. Both modes were calculated using zero to four weeks lag time. Results: The analysis shows a yearly increase of 72 - 118 IPD cases due to influenza, which corresponds to 6 - 10% per year or 12 - 20% per influenza season. Also, a lag time of one to three weeks appears to be of significant importance in the relation between IPD and influenza. Conclusion: This epidemiological study confirms the association between influenza and IPD. Furthermore, negative binomial regression models can be used to calculate number of excess cases of IPD, related to influenza.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据