4.8 Article

CD69 acts downstream of interferon-α/β to inhibit S1P1 and lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs

期刊

NATURE
卷 440, 期 7083, 页码 540-544

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature04606

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naive lymphocytes continually enter and exit lymphoid organs in a recirculation process that is essential for immune surveillance. During immune responses, the egress process can be shut down transiently(1). When this occurs locally it increases lymphocyte numbers in the responding lymphoid organ; when it occurs systemically it can lead to immunosuppression as a result of the depletion of recirculating lymphocytes. Several mediators of the innate immune system are known to cause shutdown, including interferon alpha/beta (IFN-alpha/beta) and tumour necrosis factor(2-5), but the mechanism has been unclear. Here we show that treatment with the IFN-alpha/beta inducer polyinosine polycytidylic acid (hereafter 'poly(I:C)') inhibited egress by a mechanism that was partly lymphocyte-intrinsic. The transmembrane C-type lectin CD69 was rapidly induced and CD69(-/-) cells were poorly retained in lymphoid tissues after treatment with poly(I:C) or infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. Lymphocyte egress requires sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-1 (S1P(1)), and IFN-alpha/beta was found to inhibit lymphocyte responsiveness to S1P. By contrast, CD69(-/-) cells retained S1P(1) function after exposure to IFN-alpha/beta. In coexpression experiments, CD69 inhibited S1P(1) chemotactic function and led to downmodulation of S1P(1). In a reporter assay, S1P(1) crosslinking led to co-crosslinking and activation of a CD69-CD3 zeta chimaera. CD69 co-immunoprecipitated with S1P(1) but not the related receptor, S1P(3). These observations indicate that CD69 forms a complex with and negatively regulates S1P(1) and that it functions downstream of IFN-alpha/beta, and possibly other activating stimuli, to promote lymphocyte retention in lymphoid organs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据